In Re Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plain meaning of § 1329(b)(1) demonstrates a specific reference only to § 1325(a) and not § 1325(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Grutsch
  D. Kansas· 2011-06-29· cited 17×
• In re Pautin
  W.D. Texas· 2014-11-25· cited 17×
• In Re Davis
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-12-16· cited 15×
• In Re Buck
  N.D. Georgia· 2010-11-10· cited 14×
• In Re McCully
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-12-19· cited 11×
• In Re Heideker
  M.D. Florida· 2011-06-02· cited 11×
• In re McAllister
  N.D. Georgia· 2014-04-03· cited 10×
• In Re Crim
  M.D. Tennessee· 2011-03-14· cited 6×
• In re Swain
  E.D. Virginia· 2014-04-01· cited 6×
• In re Peebles
  S.D. Georgia· 2013-09-26· cited 4×
• In re Moore
  E.D. Tennessee· 2019-04-25· cited 4×
• In Re Watson
  D. New Hampshire· 2009-10-26· cited 3×
• In re Powers
  C.D. Illinois· 2014-03-28· cited 3×
• In re Ragland
  S.D. Ohio· 2016-01-08· cited 1×