In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that both FAA and TAA applied where contracts stated they “shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located”
• holding that whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that the trial court must determine
• holding that both FAA and TAA applied where contracts stated they “shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located”
• holding that whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that the trial court must determine
• holding that both FAA and TAA applied where contracts stated they \shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located\
• holding that agreements were A not susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation and are therefore not ambiguous @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).