In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court’s decision to order forensic examination implied a finding that evidence was not reasonably available and required extraordinary steps for retrieval and production
• reasoning that a party does not have an adequate remedy on appeal when a trial court’s order imposes a burden on the producing party far out of proportion to any benefit the requesting party may obtain
• reasoning that a party does not have an adequate remedy on appeal when a trial court's order imposes a burden on the producing party far out of proportion to any benefit the requesting party may obtain
• explaining that when court permits access to electronic device, it “may not give the expert carte blanche authorization to sort through the [electronic devices]” and must “address privilege, privacy, and confidentiality concerns”
• reasoning that a party does not have an adequate remedy on appeal when a trial court’s order imposes a burden on the producing party far out of proportion to any benefit the requesting party may obtain
• noting harm party resisting discovery might suffer as result of revealing private conversations, trade secrets, and privileged and other confidential information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).