CMH HOMES v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that appellate courts lack jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals in the absence of a statutory provision permitting such an appeal
• holding that while court of appeals did not have jurisdiction to consider interlocutory appeal, appeal may properly be treated as mandamus petition upon request
• holding that party invoked appellate court’s original jurisdiction by specifically requesting that its appeal be treated as mandamus petition
• holding that the court of appeals’ original jurisdiction was invoked when the party specifically requested that its appeal be treated as a mandamus petition
• holding that “appeal may properly be considered as a petition for writ of mandamus, as [appellant] requested”
• holding that under appropriate circumstances, an interlocutory trial court order may be reviewed by mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).