Texas Supreme Court· 5/27/2011

CMH HOMES v. Perez

Citations

340 S.W.3d 444
54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1098
2011 Tex. LEXIS 390
2011 WL 2112775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that appellate courts lack jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals in the absence of a statutory provision permitting such an appeal
holding that while court of appeals did not have jurisdiction to consider interlocutory appeal, appeal may properly be treated as mandamus petition upon request
holding that party invoked appellate court’s original jurisdiction by specifically requesting that its appeal be treated as mandamus petition
holding that the court of appeals’ original jurisdiction was invoked when the party specifically requested that its appeal be treated as a mandamus petition
holding that “appeal may properly be considered as a petition for writ of mandamus, as [appellant] requested”
holding that under appropriate circumstances, an interlocutory trial court order may be reviewed by mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wainwright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

468 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.