Skip to main content

In Re CT

Citations

  • 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 897
  • 100 Cal. App. 4th 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[When] the emergency ended, . . . the California court was correct in terminating jurisdiction.”
  • “[T]he custody order . . . removed the risk C. would be sexually abused . . . . At that time, the emergency ended . . . .”
  • “The [UCCJEA] is the exclusive method of determining the proper forum in custody disputes involving other jurisdictions and governs juvenile dependency proceedings.”
  • the finding of an emergency should be made after a full and fair hearing and the court should require evidence on the issue of abuse to determine whether emergency jurisdiction is proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re CT

53 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.