Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 4/3/2007

In re C.T.

Citations

643 S.E.2d 23
182 N.C. App. 472
2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that thirteen-month delay was not prejudicial where delay inured to the respondent's benefit
\[A] case . . . where a statutorily required summons was not issued regarding a proceeding concerning a juvenile [is] a situation different from that presented by technical defects in service of a summons.\ (Emphasis in original omitted, emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.