Skip to main content
· 11/28/2006

Harshberger v. Harshberger

Citations

  • 2006 ND 245
  • 724 N.W.2d 148
  • 2006 N.D. LEXIS 251
  • 2006 WL 3411042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that courts have construed the UCCJEA as applying to paternity cases only when custody or visitation is an issue
  • recognizing that when the jurisdictional facts are not in dispute, the question of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, subject to an appellate court’s de novo review
  • holding paternity suit did not involve custody until the petitioner amended pleadings to include request for custody determination
  • “the UCCJEA establishes the criteria for deciding which state’s courts have subject matter jurisdiction to make a child custody decision involving interstate custody disputes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Kapsner, Crothers, Maring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.