· 11/28/2006
Harshberger v. Harshberger
Citations
- 2006 ND 245
- 724 N.W.2d 148
- 2006 N.D. LEXIS 251
- 2006 WL 3411042
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that courts have construed the UCCJEA as applying to paternity cases only when custody or visitation is an issue
- recognizing that when the jurisdictional facts are not in dispute, the question of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, subject to an appellate court’s de novo review
- holding paternity suit did not involve custody until the petitioner amended pleadings to include request for custody determination
- “the UCCJEA establishes the criteria for deciding which state’s courts have subject matter jurisdiction to make a child custody decision involving interstate custody disputes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Kapsner, Crothers, Maring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.