Skip to main content
· 9/25/1997

Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Citations

  • 57 Cal. App. 4th 1334
  • 67 Cal. Rptr. 2d 726
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 12311
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7682
  • 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing the plaintiff 16 to recover missed monthly payments within the four-year statute of limitations
  • applying the continuous 27 accrual doctrine to a dispute over monthly rent payments
  • applying the doctrine of continuous accrual 23 where a lessee failed to pay the full rental payment due because “statute begins to 24 run on such severable obligations from the time performance of each is due.”
  • periodic monthly rent payments owed were a recurring obligation
  • monthly rent payments owed were a recurring obligation
  • periodic monthly rent payments owed were a recurring obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.