In re: C.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding waiver occurred where a respondent did not “argue[ ] to the court or otherwise raise[ ] the issue that guardianship would be an inappropriate disposition on a constitutional basis.”
• holding waiver occurred where a respondent did not “argue[ ] to the court or otherwise raise[ ] the issue that guardianship would be an inappropriate disposition on a constitutional basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: M.T-L.Y.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-05-21· cited 10×
• In re: S.R.J.T.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-04-06
• In re: E.A.C., P.A.C., J.M.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-06
• In re: B.R.W. & B.G.W.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-20
• In re: E.A.C., P.A.C., J.M.C.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-08-03
• In re: W.C.T., W.J.A.T.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-10-19
• In re J.N. & L.N.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2022-05-06
• In re A.T.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-04-02
• In re: R.G.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-03-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re PM
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-04-05· cited 123×
• In Re BG
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-06-16· cited 32×
• In re: R.P.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-03-21· cited 21×
• In re: K.P. & C.P.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-10-04· cited 5×