Skip to main content

In re C.P.

Citations

  • 901 A.2d 516
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 122
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mother waived claim challenging termination of her parental rights because it was not included in her concise statement, among other reasons
  • holding mother’s failure to support claim on appeal with relevant legal authority or discussion precluded appellate review of issue
  • holding mother’s failure to support claim on appeal with relevant legal authority or discussion precluded appellate review of issue
  • finding that, in an appeal of an order granting termination of parental rights, mother waived her issue on appeal for, inter alia, failing to include the issue in her Rule 1925(b) concise statement
  • finding where the record was devoid of evidence regarding effect termination would have on the child, trial court had no way of assessing effect of termination on needs and welfare
  • remanding to allow agency to present further evidence regarding parent-child bond where testimony of psychologist and social worker did not sufficiently address what degree of bond existed and the effect of severing the bond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, McEwen, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re C.P.

62 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.