Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 4/5/2005

In Re PM

Citations

610 S.E.2d 403
169 N.C. App. 423
2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that respondent had abandoned factual assignments of error when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\
concluding that respondent had abandoned factual assignments of error when she “failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence”
holding that trial court properly considered parents' prior care of other children in making adjudication of neglect
concluding that the respondent had abandoned factual assignments of error when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\
concluding that the respondent had abandoned factual assignments of error when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\
holding that the respondent abandoned her assignments of error to findings of fact when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re PM

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.