Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 3/21/2017
In re: R.P.
Citations
- 798 S.E.2d 428
- 252 N.C. App. 301
- 2017 WL 1056230
- 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 182
Syllabus
?permanency planning review hearing requirements? ?constitutionally protected status of parents? ?requirement that a parent be found unfit for a change in guardianship placement.?
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a parent has a constitutional right to the care for their children absent a showing of unfitness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re: C.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-03-06· cited 15×
- In re: I.K. & K.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-08-07· cited 4×
- In re: S.R.J.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-04-06
- In re: J.R. & J.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-09-21
- In re: W.C.T., W.J.A.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-10-19
- In re: A.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-11-02
- In re J.N. & L.N.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2022-05-06
- In re S.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-05
- In re D.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-19
- In re: J.O.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-05-07
- In re: T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-03
- In re: A.T. & E.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-11-05
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.