Skip to main content

In re K.K.R.-S.

Citations

  • 958 A.2d 529
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 231
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the mere existence of a bond is not proof of a beneficial bond, and that “[e]ven - 18 - J-S03020-25 J-S03021-25 the most abused of children will often harbor some positive emotion towards the abusive parent”
  • observing that, in analyzing a parent-child bond, neither statute nor precedent require that a formal bonding evaluation be performed by an expert
  • observing that, in analyzing a parent-child bond, neither statute nor precedent require that a formal bonding evaluation be performed by an expert
  • observing that, in analyzing a parent-child bond, neither statute nor precedent require that a formal bonding evaluation be performed by an expert
  • stating that the mere existence of a bond or attachment of a child to a parent will not necessarily result in the denial of a termination petition
  • cautioning that “concluding a child has a beneficial bond with a parent simply because the child harbors affection for the parent is not only dangerous, it is logically unsound.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Stevens, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.