Skip to main content

In re C.P.

Citations

  • 998 S.W.2d 703
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • likely that trial court's refusal to sever was not an abuse of discretion where evidence of extraneous acts was admissible
  • likely that trial court’s refusal to sever was not an abuse of discretion where evidence of extraneous acts was admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Gray, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.