In Re Briscoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing exceptions for debtors “engaging in 26 subterfuge so blatant as to indicate that they have ‘unfairly manipulated the Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise 27 proposed [their] Chapter 13 plan in an inequitable manner.’” (quoting In re Goeb, 675 F.2d at 1390)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ransom v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Ransom)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-27· cited 64×
• In re: David C. Welsh and Sharon N. Welsh
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-17· cited 42×
• In Re Williams
  D. Colorado· 2008-09-12· cited 40×
• In Re Orawsky
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-05-02· cited 33×
• In Re Crink
  M.D. North Carolina· 2009-03-18· cited 23×
• Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)
  E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
• Hildebrand v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-10-31· cited 20×
• In Re Mati
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-06-09· cited 19×
• In Re Wilson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
• In Re Davis
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-07-22· cited 16×
• In Re DeThample
  D. Kansas· 2008-07-24· cited 16×
• Danielson v. Flores (In Re Flores)
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 15×
• In Re Musselman
  E.D. North Carolina· 2007-11-30· cited 14×
• In re Powers
  N.D. New York· 2016-07-13· cited 14×
• In Re Stitt
  D. Idaho· 2008-11-07· cited 12×
• In Re Phillips
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-02-07· cited 11×
• In Re Young
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-08· cited 11×
• In Re Rush
  W.D. Missouri· 2008-04-24· cited 11×
• eCast Settlement Corp. v. May (In Re May)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-01-28· cited 10×
• In Re Cranmer
  D. Utah· 2010-06-28· cited 10×