In Re Automated Collection Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that forum-selection clause stating that the parties “consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania” was mandatory
• holding that forum-selection clause stating that the parties “consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania” was mandatory
• concluding that a forum-selection clause designating “exclusive forum” was mandatory
• holding the enforcement of forum selection clause stating that the parties “consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania” is mandatory
• holding the enforcement of forum selection clause stating that the parties “consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania” is mandatory
• holding mandatory a forum selection clause which stated the parties “consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).