In Re Lyon Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that arbitration clauses do not require mutuality of obligation so long as adequate consideration supports the underlying contract
• concluding that contracting party was still bound by terms of written contract despite false oral representation to the contracting party that the forum-selection clause did not apply
• holding that forum-selection clauses do not require mutuality of obligation
• holding inability to assert a claim for usury under Pennsylvania law did not create a public policy reason to deny enforcement of the forum-selection clause
• explaining that a trial court abuses its discretion in refusing to enforce a forum-selection clause absent clear evidence of one of these factors
• noting that “arbitration clauses generally do not require mutuality of obligation so long as adequate consideration supports the underlying contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).