Skip to main content
· 8/25/2005

Phoenix Network Technologies (Europe) Ltd. v. Neon Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 177 S.W.3d 605
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6935
  • 2005 WL 2037325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under federal analysis party invoking forum-selection clause need not show that forum selected recognizes the validity of forum-selection clauses
  • holding that words “shall” and “the” in venue-selection clause established mandatory and exclusive venue, respectively, and thus clause constituted forum-selection provision
  • holding that under federal analysis party invoking forum-selection clause need not show that forum selected recognizes the validity of forum-selection clauses
  • concluding that the equitable-estoppel theories regarding non-signatories to arbitration agreements should also be applied to forum-selection clauses that do not involve arbitration
  • concluding party was bound by forum-selection clause because it had not made this required showing
  • applying arbitration law to question of whether to enforce a forum selection clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tim Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.