· 8/25/2005
Phoenix Network Technologies (Europe) Ltd. v. Neon Systems, Inc.
Citations
- 177 S.W.3d 605
- 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6935
- 2005 WL 2037325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under federal analysis party invoking forum-selection clause need not show that forum selected recognizes the validity of forum-selection clauses
- holding that words “shall” and “the” in venue-selection clause established mandatory and exclusive venue, respectively, and thus clause constituted forum-selection provision
- holding that under federal analysis party invoking forum-selection clause need not show that forum selected recognizes the validity of forum-selection clauses
- concluding that the equitable-estoppel theories regarding non-signatories to arbitration agreements should also be applied to forum-selection clauses that do not involve arbitration
- concluding party was bound by forum-selection clause because it had not made this required showing
- applying arbitration law to question of whether to enforce a forum selection clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tim Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.