In Re Bruce Terminix Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing an answer and propounding a set of eighteen interrogatories and a set of nineteen requests for production did not waive arbitration rights
• holding that movant did not waive arbitration rights by propounding requests for production and interrogatories and waiting six months to seek arbitration
• holding that movant did not waive arbitration rights by propounding requests for production and interrogatories and waiting six months to seek arbitration
• holding that propounding one set of eighteen interrogatories and nineteen production requests does not waive arbitration rights
• noting that even substantial invocation of judicial process does not constitute waiver absent proof of prejudice
• holding arbitration was not waived by sending eighteen interrogatories and nineteen requests for production and waiting six months to seek arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).