Skip to main content

In re A.P.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 139

Syllabus

Appellant-Father did not file objections to a magistrate's decision overruling his motion for contempt regarding visitation and his motion seeking a custody change. Appellate review, therefore, is confined to a plain error analysis. But a claim that a judgment is against the manifest weight of the evidence, as Appellant asserts, is not subject to a plain error analysis. Further, a review of the record does not reveal that overruling either motion constituted an abuse of discretion. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.