In re A.P.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 139
Syllabus
Appellant-Father did not file objections to a magistrate's decision overruling his motion for contempt regarding visitation and his motion seeking a custody change. Appellate review, therefore, is confined to a plain error analysis. But a claim that a judgment is against the manifest weight of the evidence, as Appellant asserts, is not subject to a plain error analysis. Further, a review of the record does not reveal that overruling either motion constituted an abuse of discretion. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schoolcraft v. MarkelOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-26· cited 2×
- In re C.COhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-18· cited 2×
- In re A.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-17· cited 2×
- In re B.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-22· cited 1×
- In re L.Z.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-02· cited 1×
- In re A.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-31· cited 1×
- Brehm v. BrehmOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-29· cited 1×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-23· cited 1×
- Hitchcock v. HitchcockOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-29· cited 1×
- In re G.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.