In Re Asbestos Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When a trial court determines that an expert’s testimony is reliable, this does not mean that contradictory expert testimony by default is unreliable.”
• “Dr. Frank’s approach reflects a sound methodology consistent with Daubert’s ‘reliability’ component.”
• “Proponents do not need to demonstrate to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that the assessments of their experts are correct, they only have to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that their opinions are reliable.”
• “Proponents do not need to demonstrate to the judge by a preponderance of the evidence that the assessments of their experts are correct, they only have to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that their opinions are reliable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• General Motors Corp. v. Grenier
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2009-08-24· cited 22×
• General Motors Corp. v. Grenier
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2009-02-04· cited 7×
• Laugelle v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-10-06
• Knott v. Covert
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-01-15
• DiStefano v. KW Solar Solutions, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2019-06-27
• State v. Patel
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-02-26
• Richard v. Faw, Casson & Co., LLC
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-03-08
• State v. Herbert
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-08-08
• Sofregen Medical Inc. v. Allergan Sales, LLC
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2023-05-25
• Davis v. Crosse
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2023-10-31
• In Re Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2024-05-31
• Brown v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2024-12-20
• Brown v. Fisher-Price
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2025-04-30
• In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2025-07-10
• In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2026-04-14

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
  Supreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
• In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation
  Third Circuit· 1994-10-17· cited 1,409×
• Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-09-10· cited 466×
• Carol Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1999-02-03· cited 435×
• Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.
  First Circuit· 1998-12-01· cited 366×
• England v. Chrysler Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 339×
• Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-10-26· cited 335×
• Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical Company
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-06-12· cited 272×
• M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le Beau
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1999-05-27· cited 201×
• Mr. And Mrs. Floyd Brock, Individually and as Next Friend of Rachel Brock, a Minor v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1989-06-06· cited 187×
• Kachina Plywood, Inc. v. Hurt
  Supreme Court· 1995-02-27· cited 127×
• Nutt v. AC & S. CO., INC.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1986-06-05· cited 104×
• Culver v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-03-21· cited 98×
• Mr. & Mrs. Floyd Brock, Individually and as Next Friend of Rachel Brock, a Minor v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1989-08-15· cited 85×
• Nelson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-07-30· cited 85×
• Minner v. American Mortgage & Guaranty Co.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2000-04-17· cited 54×
• Becker v. Baron Bros.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-11-15· cited 49×
• Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Trust Fund
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-08-07· cited 49×
• General Electric Co. v. Ingram
  Supreme Court· 1995-02-27· cited 49×