Becker v. Baron Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court is \not bound by [federal court] decisions in respect of our own State law.\
• finding that a jury question was presented by conflicting expert testimony regarding the risk posed by processed chrysotile asbestos
• “A failure to warn, or a failure to warn properly, can constitute a defect in a product sufficient to support an action in strict liability.”
• “A failure to warn, or a failure to warn properly, can constitute a defect in a product sufficient to support an action in strict liability.”
• where conflicting proof was presented as to the dangers of asbestos-containing products, it was error to instruct the jury that all asbestos-containing brake products were defective as a matter of law
• where conflicting proof was presented as to the dangers of asbestos-containing products, it was error to instruct the jury that all asbestos-containing brake products were defective as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).