Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/18/1991
Bowers v. Bowers
Citations
- 475 N.W.2d 394
- 190 Mich. App. 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a six-year-old child is old enough to have his preference given some weight under factor i
- holding that children as young as six years old “are old enough to have their preferences given some weight”
- holding that a six-year-old child is old enough to have his preference given some weight under factor i
- holding that children as young as six years old are of “sufficient age to express preference” under MCL 722.23(i)
- all orders and judgments in a divorce case should be affirmed unless the trial court's factual findings are clearly erroneous
- all orders and judgments in a divorce case should be affirmed unless the trial court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood, McDonald, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-30· cited 264×
- Demski v. PetlickMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-03-05· cited 147×
- Foskett v. FoskettMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-10-19· cited 120×
- Pierron v. PierronMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-02-03· cited 93×
- Rivette v. Rose-MolinaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-03-27· cited 91×
- Rittershaus v. RittershausMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 82×
- Kessler v. KesslerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-12-06· cited 78×
- Thames v. ThamesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-09-16· cited 73×
- Kubicki v. SharpeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-08-28· cited 73×
- Spires v. BergmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-10-26· cited 56×
- Maier v. MaierMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-06-25· cited 46×
- In Re APMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-05-05· cited 33×
- Jack v. JackMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-05-04· cited 26×
- Bowers v. BowersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-03-01· cited 20×
- Treutle v. TreutleMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-12-29· cited 18×
- Rummelt v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-10-28· cited 14×
- Harper v. HarperMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-04-20· cited 5×
- Joseph Richard Demski v. Cassidie PetlickMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-03-05
- Bridget Lee Bofysil v. Sarah Lynne BofysilMichigan Supreme Court· 2021-07-09
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beason v. BeasonMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 174×
- Daniels v. DanielsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-01-20· cited 26×
- Lewis v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals· 1977-02-03· cited 20×
- Stringer v. VincentMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-07-07· cited 17×
- Curless v. CurlessMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-09-18· cited 14×
- Zuziak v. ZuziakMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-07-05· cited 13×
- Schwiesow v. SchwiesowMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-04-21· cited 10×
- DeVries v. DeVriesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-09-21· cited 8×
- Beckett v. BeckettMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-11-05· cited 7×
- Helms v. HelmsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-10-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.