Michigan Supreme Court· 6/9/2004
Harvey v. Harvey
Citations
- 680 N.W.2d 835
- 470 Mich. 186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[n]othing in the Child Custody Act gives parents or any other party the power to exclude the legislatively mandated ‘best interests’ factors from the court’s deliberations once a custody dispute reaches the court”
- holding that when a trial court signs an order memorializing the parties’ agreement regarding custody, it indicates that the trial court has “satisf[ied] itself concerning the best interests of the children”
- holding that the trial court must “determine -4- independently what custodial placement is in the best interests of the children” notwithstanding an earlier FOC recommendation following an evidentiary hearing before an FOC referee
- holding that the trial court must “determine -4- independently what custodial placement is in the best interests of the children” notwithstanding an earlier FOC recommendation following an evidentiary hearing before an FOC referee
- holding that the Child Custody Act (CCA), MCL 722.21 et seq., “impose[s] on the trial court the duty to ensure that the resolution of any custody dispute is in the best interests of the child”
- stating that \parties cannot stipulate to circumvent the authority of the circuit court in determining the custody of children\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corrigan, Cavanagh, Weaver, Kelly, Taylor, Young, Markman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Corporan v. HentonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05· cited 129×
- McIntosh v. McIntoshMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-02-17· cited 115×
- Grange Insurance Co of Michigan v. Edward LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court· 2013-07-29· cited 107×
- Rivette v. Rose-MolinaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-03-27· cited 91×
- Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court· 2005-01-26· cited 90×
- Rittershaus v. RittershausMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 82×
- Surman v. SurmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 80×
- Bayati v. BayatiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-02-02· cited 79×
- Kessler v. KesslerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-12-06· cited 78×
- Porter v. PorterMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-09-01· cited 76×
- MacIntyre v. MacIntyreMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-10-26· cited 73×
- Diez v. DaveyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 36×
- In Re APMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-05-05· cited 33×
- Helton v. BeamanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-02-04· cited 30×
- Glaubius v. GlaubiusMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-07-15· cited 23×
- In Re AnjoskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-03-19· cited 21×
- Killingbeck v. KillingbeckMichigan Court of Appeals· 2006-02-16· cited 20×
- Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-10-11· cited 17×
- Jamie Kim Rettig v. Jeffrey RettigMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-01-23· cited 14×
- Mason v. SimmonsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-09-15· cited 11×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 305×
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court· 1991-03-18· cited 193×
- Van v. ZahorikMichigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-07· cited 100×
- Lombardo v. LombardoMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-10-18· cited 60×
- Greene v. GreeneMichigan Supreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 32×
- Harvey v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-08-20· cited 16×
- Napora v. NaporaMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-10-29· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.