Kelley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The question, then, is whether the State has sufficiently established beyond a reasonable doubt that there was, or, in this case, was not, a single larcenous scheme or course of conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Weems
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-20· cited 19×
• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-07-02· cited 19×
• In Re Allen
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-08· cited 9×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-02· cited 7×
• Webb v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-12· cited 3×
• Weems v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-02· cited 1×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-03-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rowell
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 191×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-05· cited 46×
• Richardson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-09-02· cited 43×
• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-03-14· cited 40×
• State v. Cabbell
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1977-04-20· cited 22×
• People v. Perlstein
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-10-17· cited 20×
• State v. Maggard
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1901-02-26· cited 15×
• Govostis v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-07· cited 12×
• State v. Hunt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-13· cited 7×
• Dyson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-07-13· cited 4×