E.D. New York· 3/29/2011
In Re Agape Litigation
Citations
- 773 F. Supp. 2d 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “actual knowledge element of a claim for aiding and abetting is a distinct requirement from the scienter required to allege the underlying fraud”
- commingling of investor funds showed at most constructive knowledge of fraud even where bank employees “actually saw” the account activity
- stating the elements of aiding and abetting fraud under New York law, and further stating that New York law requires the complaint to set forth allegations that the defendant have actual knowledge of the fraud
- claims for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty and conversion each require allegations of actual knowledge of the principal’s breach
- “[W]hile a visual representation of the account activity and actual dollar amounts in hindsight may suggest that the fraud was obvious, ... the Court can only infer that-this information raises an inference of BOA’s constructive knowledge of the fraud.”
- “It is well-settled that a plaintiff cannot amend the complaint through briefs and affidavits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Picard v. Legacy Capital Ltd. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)S.D. New York· 2016-03-14· cited 173×
- Stillwater Liquidating LLC v. Net Five at Palm Pointe, LLC (In re Stillwater Asset Backed Offshore Fund Ltd.)S.D. New York· 2016-09-02· cited 11×
- Yao-Yi v. Wilmington Trust Co.W.D. New York· 2017-09-26· cited 7×
- Clarke v. CosmoE.D. New York· 2011-05-19
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Harris v. MillsSecond Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 5,185×
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 1,243×
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Second Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 714×
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 639×
- In Re: Sharp International Corp. & Sharp Sales Corp., Debtors. Sharp International Corp., Debtor-Appellant v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanySecond Circuit· 2005-04-01· cited 473×
- Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 2006-12-14· cited 275×
- Wight v. BankAmerica Corp.Second Circuit· 2000-05-25· cited 274×
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Second Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 231×
- Armstrong v. McalpinSecond Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 145×
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerS.D. New York· 2001-04-17· cited 141×
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.S.D. New York· 2010-08-18· cited 133×
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCS.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 110×
- Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals· 1989-02-23· cited 101×
- Oster v. KirschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-07-06· cited 89×
- Kolbeck v. LIT America, Inc.S.D. New York· 1996-08-26· cited 74×
- Fraternity Fund Ltd. v. Beacon Hill Asset Management, LLCS.D. New York· 2007-03-27· cited 62×
- Kottler v. Deutsche Bank AGS.D. New York· 2009-01-09· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.