S.D. New York· 4/17/2001
Cromer Finance Ltd. v. Berger
Citations
- 137 F. Supp. 2d 452
- 189 A.L.R. Fed. 593
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4681
- 2001 WL 392669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a substantial part of the alleged misconduct occurred in New York
- noting New York’s strong interest in having its law apply where defendants conducted themselves pursuant to standards in New York
- plaintiffs alleged that the fund administrator used false NAV figures provided by introducing broker despite concurrent receipt of accurate financial information from clearing broker
- “Ordinary economic motive, however, is insufficient to support the [pleading of a clear opportunity and motive to aid the fraud]”
- “A plaintiff need only plead facts supporting a reasonable inference of control to survive a motion to dismiss.” (quotations omitted)
- “A clear- ing broker does not provide ‘substantial assistance’ to or ‘partici- pate’ in a fraud when it merely clears trades.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cote
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- SPV Osus Ltd. v. UBS AGSecond Circuit· 2018-02-09· cited 285×
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.C.D. California· 2003-10-20· cited 244×
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2003-02-19· cited 193×
- Bear, Stearns Securities Corp. v. Gredd (In Re Manhattan Investment Fund Ltd.)S.D. New York· 2007-12-17· cited 132×
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCS.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 110×
- Marriott International Resorts, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2009-10-28· cited 104×
- Buonasera v. Honest Co.S.D. New York· 2016-09-23· cited 101×
- In Re AOL Time Warner, Inc. Securities & \Erisa\ LitigationS.D. New York· 2004-05-05· cited 83×
- Levitt v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.Second Circuit· 2013-03-15· cited 70×
- Kottler v. Deutsche Bank AGS.D. New York· 2009-01-09· cited 62×
- Licci ex rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALSecond Circuit· 2013-10-18· cited 61×
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerS.D. New York· 2001-12-27· cited 56×
- In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationS.D. New York· 2008-10-06· cited 54×
- In Re Independent Energy Holdings PLC Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2001-07-26· cited 54×
- Spagnola v. Chubb Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-01-07· cited 51×
- Drenis v. HaligiannisS.D. New York· 2006-09-25· cited 48×
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationD. Maryland· 2004-12-21· cited 48×
- In Re CINAR Corp. Securities LitigationE.D. New York· 2002-03-05· cited 44×
- In Re Philip Services Corp. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2004-05-24· cited 43×
- Gutierrez v. Cayman Islands Firm of Deloitte & ToucheTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-01-29· cited 40×
Other cases named Cromer Finance Ltd. v. Berger
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.