In re H.S.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3210
Syllabus
Termination of parental rights Manifest weight of the evidence Abandonment GAL duties under Sup.R. 48 Best interest of the child. The trial court's determination to grant the motion for permanent custody was supported by the weight of the evidence when the child was in the care of the Agency for more than 12 out of a consecutive 22 month period and the factors indicated that terminating parental rights was in the best interest of the child. Father did not abandon his child unless he lacked contact for a 90 day period. Guardian Ad Litem did not perform duties pursuant to the Superintendent's rules, but a violation is not reversible error. Trial court did not err in denying mother's motion for an extension of time. Trial court did not err in denying motion to convey when it was not timely filed and no timely motion to appear by zoom was filed for the hearing.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-19· cited 64×
- In re T.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-10· cited 19×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-19· cited 16×
- In re A.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-07-17· cited 12×
- In re S.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-12· cited 11×
- State v. DoogsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-20· cited 5×
- In re W.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.