Hutchison v. KFC Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• precluding that plaintiffs unjust enrichment and unfair competition claims because they are based solely on trade secrets
• explaining that Nevada’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act displaced common-law tort of unfair competition, at least where underlying theory of unjust-enrichment claim concerns misappropriation of trade secrets
• preempting “duplicative” claims for unjust enrichment and unfair competition under the UTSA, but considering the merits of alleged tortious interference claim
• preempting \duplicative\ claims for unjust enrichment and unfair competition under the UTSA, but considering the merits of alleged tortious interference claim
• granting plaintiffs leave to amend to plead their common law and constructive 6 fraud claims with more particularity
• dismissing plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment and unfair competition claims based on allegations that defendant misappropriated plaintiffs’ trade secrets because claims were preempted by Nevada trade secrets act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).