Skip to main content
· 5/4/2000

Frantz v. Johnson

Citations

  • 999 P.2d 351
  • 1 Nev. 455
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 53
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Minnesota Uniform Trade Secrets Act displaced common law causes of action for misappropriation of trade secrets
  • holding that UTSA preempted a breach of fiduciary duty claim because it was \completely dependent on the facts concerning misappropriation of trade secrets\
  • holding that customer lists can be 14 protected as a trade secret
  • holding UTSA preempts where the “factual circumstances underlying the claims ... are completely dependent on the facts concerning misappropriation of trade secrets”
  • providing that causation of damages may be inferred by certain circumstantial evidence in a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets
  • providing that causation of damages may be inferred by certain circumstantial evidence in a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Shearing, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.