Skip to main content
· 11/29/1994

Coulter Corp. v. Leinert

Citations

  • 869 F. Supp. 732
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17089
  • 1994 WL 669865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that only those claims that are premised entirely on a trade secret are abrogated
  • concluding that only those claims that are premised entirely on a trade secret are abrogated
  • stating that in light of the UTSA’s displacement provision, “the issue becomes whether allegations of trade secret misappropriation alone comprise the underlying wrong; if so, the cause of action is barred”
  • “[T]he issue becomes whether allegations of trade secret misappropriation alone comprise the underlying wrong; if so the cause of action is barred.”
  • analyz ing an identical provision of the Uniform Trade Secret Act and explaining that “the issue becomes whether allegations of trade secret misappropriation alone comprise the underlying wrong; if so the cause of action is barred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.