· 11/29/1994
Coulter Corp. v. Leinert
Citations
- 869 F. Supp. 732
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17089
- 1994 WL 669865
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that only those claims that are premised entirely on a trade secret are abrogated
- concluding that only those claims that are premised entirely on a trade secret are abrogated
- stating that in light of the UTSA’s displacement provision, “the issue becomes whether allegations of trade secret misappropriation alone comprise the underlying wrong; if so, the cause of action is barred”
- “[T]he issue becomes whether allegations of trade secret misappropriation alone comprise the underlying wrong; if so the cause of action is barred.”
- analyz ing an identical provision of the Uniform Trade Secret Act and explaining that “the issue becomes whether allegations of trade secret misappropriation alone comprise the underlying wrong; if so the cause of action is barred”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.