Skip to main content

Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.

Citations

  • 29 F. Supp. 3d 736
  • 2014 WL 3362287
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the plaintiffs' \'fraud-based claims' … are simply repackaged failure-to-warn claims.\
  • finding that a physician who reviewed the IFU but could not recall when they last reviewed it was distinguishable from Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson, wherein the physician testified they did not rely on the IFU
  • collecting cases finding the learned intermediary doctrine extends to all claims based on a failure to warn, including fraud-based claims
  • stating “an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief or memorandum will not be considered.”
  • stating “an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief or memorandum will not be considered.”
  • awarding judgment to Ethicon on fraud, fraudulent concealment, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of warranty claims under Illinois law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.