Skip to main content
· 7/21/2006

Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.

Citations

  • 451 F.3d 104
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12181
  • 2006 WL 1328835

About this case

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2008 United States Supreme Court case

Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the pre-emption clause of the Medical Device Amendment bars state common-law claims that challenge the effectiveness or safety of a medical device marketed in a form that received premarket approval from the Food and Drug Administration .[1]

It modified the rule in _Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr _.[2]

See also

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riegel_v._Medtronic,_Inc.&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: See also")
]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riegel_v._Medtronic,_Inc.&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).
  2. _Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr _, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).

Further reading

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riegel_v._Medtronic,_Inc.&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Further reading")
]

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riegel_v._Medtronic,_Inc.&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: External links")
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riegel_v._Medtronic,_Inc.&oldid=1351342190 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.

Add languages Add topic

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Judges: Pooler, Katzmann, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.