S.D. West Virginia· 2/23/2017
Mullins v. Johnson & Johnson
Citations
- 236 F. Supp. 3d 940
- 2017 WL 711766
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Rejecting evidence of an alternative surgical procedure and an entirely different product, and finding that the plaintiffs “must provide evidence of an alternative, feasible design for the product at issue.”
- ‘‘[e]vidence that a surgical procedure should have been used in place of a device is not an alternative, feasible design in relation to the TVT’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Joseph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 186×
- Talley v. Danek Medical, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1999-07-12· cited 93×
- Ilosky v. Michelin Tire Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 77×
- Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.S.D. West Virginia· 2014-07-08· cited 32×
- Lewis v. Johnson & JohnsonS.D. West Virginia· 2014-01-15· cited 29×
- Anderson v. Chrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-03-15· cited 26×
- Bennett v. ASCO Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.