Skip to main content
· 9/21/2011

Huon v. Johnson & Bell, Ltd.

Citations

  • 657 F.3d 641
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19318
  • 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 636
  • 2011 WL 4375705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Abstention requires more than the pendency of another lawsuit, because judicial economy will always be an issue when there is concurrent litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.