Skip to main content
· 3/9/1995

Lambert BRZOSTOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 337
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4659
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,461
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 385
  • 1995 WL 96860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding identity of causes of action when “claims … clearly arise out of the same core of operative facts and are based on the same factual allegations,” even when “the legal elements of each claim may be different”
  • stating plaintiff “could have delayed the filing of his first suit or requested that the court postpone or stay the first case. What he cannot do, as he did here, is split causes of action and use different theories of recovery as sep‐ arate bases for multiple suits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Flaum, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.