Skip to main content

Waters v. State

Citations

  • 483 P.2d 199
  • 1971 Alas. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that a sentence which may be too severe standing alone is justified when viewed in conjunction with totality of sentences received by the defendant on all pending charges
  • grouping recommended by The President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society 513 (Avon 1968)
  • sentences simultaneously imposed for sale of cocaine and armed robbery must be considered together in determining whether either is excessive.
  • acts charged in an indictment, which is later dismissed, are not evidence of guilty conduct and are not to be relied on by sentencing judge
  • defendant’s prior criminal record supported worst offender classification even though particular offense, viewed in isolation, would not have
  • court held that a sentence that might appear excessive when viewed in isolation might be appropriate in light of the total sentence imposed for multiple crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boney, Dimond, Rabinowitz, Connor, Erwin, JJ-

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

127 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.