Skip to main content
· 9/3/2004

Robert Golden, Attorney-In-Fact for Leah Golden Donald Earwood, of the Estate of Helen Earwood v. David S. Golden Darlene Koposko

Citations

  • 382 F.3d 348
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18747
  • 2004 WL 1949236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that federal courts have a “continuing obligation to investigate their jurisdiction over the matters before them”
  • finding that plaintiffs claims of undue influence, forgery, and breach of fiduciary duty “would [have] interfere[d] with the already-completed probate proceedings and, therefore, [were] subject to the probate exception”
  • “causes of action involving trusts are treated under the probate exception in the same way as actions involving wills”
  • federal courts are under “a continuing obligation to investigate their jurisdiction over the matters before them.”
  • “In diversity actions involving estates, the courts look to the citizenship of the decedent to determine jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, Chertoff, Debevoise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.