Skip to main content

Hubbard v. State

Citations

  • 16 A.3d 912
  • 2011 Del. LEXIS 192
  • 2011 WL 1380069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that while “written Miranda waivers are a best police practice . . . [t]hey are not required, . . . as a matter of law”
  • adopting and applying the United States Supreme Court’s test set forth in Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986), to a claim that the defendant wasn’t—due to drug and alcohol use—competent to understand the Miranda rights he was waiving and the consequences of such a waiver
  • “Mr. Peters’ alleged utterance in the police car would be admissible if it were not the product of additional police questioning and was truly spontaneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.