United States v. Alonzo L. Harris A/K/A \Letter\ Alonzo L. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there will be crimes where the offender will use mace but will not cause bodily injury to victims
• finding that there will be crimes where the offender will use mace but will not cause bodily injury to victims
• noting that the District Court's \cryptic articulation of its reasoning” was \too conclusory to permit us to perform our review function and attempt to assure the uniformity of sentencing that Congress sought to achieve”
• government did not produce evidence to establish that mace used to spray tellers during a bank robbery was a “dangerous weapon” for purposes of sentence enhancement under the' United States Sentencing Guidelines
• “[Tjhe Government is not required to show prejudice when a defendant has shown no sufficient grounds for permitting withdrawal of a plea.” (quoting United States v. Saft, 558 F.2d 1073, 1083 (2d Cir. 1977) (alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).