Utah Supreme Court· 8/2/1985
Olson v. Olson
Citations
- 704 P.2d 564
- 1985 Utah LEXIS 857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that where parties “experience[] a temporary decrease in income, [their] historical earnings must be taken into account in determining the amount of alimony to be paid”
- “to maintain the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage, the living expenses of the wife and minor children would be $4,200 per month”
- an appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s ruling if these factors are adequately addressed
- an appellate court will not disturb a trial court's ruling if these factors are adequately addressed
- court modified divorce decree to delete provision that alimony would terminate after two years where monthly amount was reasonable but two-year limit was not
- even though findings were inadequate as to financial needs of wife, no remand was necessary because even accepting the wife’s evidence as true, there was no abuse of discretion by trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Stewart, Durham, Howe, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Howell v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-28· cited 42×
- Moon v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-01-22· cited 41×
- Adams v. Board of Review of Indus. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-05· cited 40×
- Rasband v. RasbandCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-04-18· cited 39×
- Naranjo v. NaranjoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-03-22· cited 35×
- Bakanowski v. BakanowskiCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-10-23· cited 34×
- Fullmer v. FullmerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-09-16· cited 32×
- Petersen v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-05-18· cited 30×
- Martinez v. MartinezUtah Supreme Court· 1991-09-16· cited 27×
- Munns v. MunnsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-04-04· cited 25×
- Rayburn v. RayburnCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-05-29· cited 23×
- Sorensen v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-10· cited 23×
- Martinez v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-04-19· cited 20×
- Sorensen v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court· 1992-03-30· cited 19×
- Mark v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2009-12-10· cited 18×
- Williamson v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-07-01· cited 17×
- Andersen v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-06-22· cited 15×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-03-08· cited 9×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-03-23· cited 9×
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-07-05· cited 8×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. JonesUtah Supreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 118×
- English v. EnglishUtah Supreme Court· 1977-06-02· cited 73×
- Higley v. HigleyUtah Supreme Court· 1983-12-19· cited 27×
- Read v. ReadUtah Supreme Court· 1979-04-04· cited 19×
- Dority v. DorityUtah Supreme Court· 1982-03-24· cited 8×
- Westenskow v. WestenskowUtah Supreme Court· 1977-04-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.