Skip to main content

Peck v. Peck

Citations

  • 738 P.2d 1050
  • 61 Utah Adv. Rep. 30
  • 1987 Utah App. LEXIS 488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the value of marital property may be viewed at a time other than the date of the divorce decree or trial when one party has dissipated the asset
  • where one party hides or dissipates assets, the trial court may value property at a date earlier than trial
  • marital estate valued at time of separation when one party “acted obstructively”
  • family 12. Wife makes no argument on appeal that she is entitled to half of any post‐separation interest or other appreciation in the account’s value attributable to pre‐separation contributions. 20100764‐CA 22 2013 UT App 84 Donnelly v. Donnelly business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenwood, Bench, Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.