Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 710 S.E.2d 761
  • 289 Ga. 207
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1505
  • 2011 Ga. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because defendant’s current appeal raised the same issue as a previous appeal that was dismissed as untimely, party’s current appeal was barred under the doctrine of res judicata
  • “Because Howard cannot re-litigate here the same issues that were dismissed in his prior appeals, these claims will not be considered.”
  • “Because [the appellant] cannot re-litigate here the same issues that were dismissed in his prior appeals, these claims will not be considered.”
  • “Because [defendant] cannot re-litigate here the same issues that were dismissed in his prior appeals, these claims will not be considered.”
  • “Because Howard cannot re-litigate here the same issues that were dismissed in his prior appeals, these claims will not be considered.”
  • defendant “cannot re-litigate here the same issues that were dismissed in his prior appeals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.