Skip to main content
· 9/10/2003

Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines

Citations

  • 343 F.3d 769
  • 199 A.L.R. Fed. 743
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18759
  • 2003 WL 22004097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that second prong was satisfied where shipper signed contract that limited liability
  • concluding plaintiffs continued to be citizens of Mississippi for purposes of diversity jurisdiction despite military assignment and current residence in Maryland
  • concluding plaintiffs continued to be citizens of Mississippi for purposes of diversity jurisdiction despite military assignment and current residence in Maryland
  • finding precedent abrogated where an intervening Supreme Court case \shift[ed] [the] focus\ of the applicable test
  • addressing the “validity of the $70,000 limitation of liability” and finding all four-Hughes elements satisfied, including “the reasonable opportunity to choose among two levels of liability”
  • “Under the well-pleaded complaint rule, ‘federal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff s properly pleaded complaint.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, Stewart, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.