Gutierrez v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the CSRA does not apply or strip jurisdiction because “this 8 Case: 22-40043 Document: 00516687563 Page: 9 Date Filed: 03/23/2023 No. 22-40043 case does not involve . . . any adverse employment action”
• “[A]ny doubt as to the proprietary of removal should be resolved in favor of remand.” (quotation omitted)
• Federal jurisdiction exists “only if a federal question appears on the face of the plaintiff's well- pleaded complaint[.|” (citation omitted)
• “[I]t is express preemption that is at issue in this case as the FAAA states explicitly what states may and may not do with respect to motor carriers of property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).