Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 6/22/2000

Johnson v. Baylor University

Citations

  • 214 F.3d 630
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14603
  • 2000 WL 729399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the first element of the “tripartite test for complete preemption” requires showing that federal law “contains a civil enforcement provision that creates a cause of action that both replaces and protects the analogous area of state law”
  • “Complete preemption, which creates federal removal jurisdiction, differs from more common ‘ordinary preemption’ (also known as ‘conflict preemption’) which does not.”
  • “‘Complete preemption,’ which creates federal removal jurisdiction, differs from more common ‘ordinary preemption’ (also known as ‘conflict preemption’), which does not.”
  • “Ordinarily, the term federal preemption refers to ordinary preemption . . .” (citation omitted)
  • “few federal statutes can meet such an exacting standard”
  • reciting test for complete preemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Smith, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Johnson v. Baylor University

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.