Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, in order to properly effect service under Rule 4 in an IFP case, the plaintiff 14 was required to “furnish the information necessary to identify the defendant.”
• noting requirement for a plaintiff to provide correct 19 information to the United States Marshals service to serve a defendant
• in order to properly effect service under Rule 4 in an IFP case, the plaintiff is required to “furnish the information necessary to identify the defendant.”
• in order to properly effect service under Rule 4 in an IFP case, the plaintiff is required to “furnish the 26 information necessary to identify the defendant.”
• in order to properly effect service under Rule 4 in an IFP case, the plaintiff is required to “furnish the information necessary to 24 identify the defendant.”
• in order to properly effect service under Rule 4 in an IFP case, the plaintiff is required to “furnish 25 the information necessary to identify the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).