McCall v. California
Citations
- 136 U.S. 104
- 10 S. Ct. 881
- 34 L. Ed. 391
- 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2202
Syllabus
<p>■ An agency of a line of railroad between Chicago and New York, established in San Francisco .for the purpose of inducing passengers going from San Francisco to New York to take that line at Chicago, but not engaged in selling tickets for the route, or receiving or paying out money on account of it, is an agency engaged in interstate commerce; and a license-tax imposed upon the agent for the privilege of doing business in San Francisco is. a tax upon interstate commerce, and is unconstitutional.</p>
Judges: Lamar, Fuller, Gray, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court· 1913-06-09· cited 719×
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 490×
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court· 1910-04-04· cited 360×
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 324×
- McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 284×
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court· 1923-05-21· cited 231×
- Williams v. FearsSupreme Court· 1900-12-10· cited 224×
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court· 1922-02-27· cited 188×
- Pacific Express Co. v. SeibertSupreme Court· 1892-01-04· cited 183×
- Crew Levick Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1917-12-10· cited 179×
- Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 173×
- Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 172×
- California v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 149×
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Eighth Circuit· 1907-10-25· cited 143×
- Puget Sound Stevedoring Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1937-11-08· cited 142×
- Helson & Randolph v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1929-04-08· cited 133×
- Cheney Bros. Co. v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1916-04-20· cited 122×
- Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 96×
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co. v. BotkinSupreme Court· 1916-02-21· cited 90×
- Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court· 1903-06-01· cited 73×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1869-11-18· cited 857×
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 570×
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1888-01-30· cited 341×
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court· 1876-11-18· cited 306×
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court· 1888-05-14· cited 283×
- Stoutenburgh v. HennickSupreme Court· 1889-01-14· cited 157×
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court· 1888-10-29· cited 134×
Other cases named McCall v. California
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.