Skip to main content

Hoskins v. Maricle

Citations

  • 150 S.W.3d 1
  • 2004 WL 1906855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing trial court’s rejection of plea agreement for abuse of discretion
  • noting the Court in Shumaker \held for the first time since 1915 that a writ could not be issued to prohibit a lower court from proceeding outside its jurisdiction absent a showing that there was no adequate remedy by appeal.\
  • “In other words, only after determining that the prerequisites exist will the court decide whether an error occurred for which a writ should issue.”
  • “[0]nly after determining that the prerequisites exist will the court decide whether an error occurred for which a writ should issue.”
  • “[0]nly after determining that the prerequisites exist will the court decide whether an error occurred for which a writ should issue.”
  • “But if the petition alleged only that the trial court was acting erroneously within its jurisdiction, a writ would issue only if it was shown that there was no adequate remedy by appeal and great injustice and irreparable harm would otherwise occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: R. Cletus Maricle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

181 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.