District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/8/1990
Holmes v. State
Citations
- 557 So. 2d 933
- 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1377
- 1990 WL 20398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- threat must be actual; information must be disclosed to the trial judge in camera; judge must determine whether effective cross examination will be denied if the information is withheld; and the accused has the right to show a special need for the information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobb, Griffin, Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 763×
- United States v. Richard AlstonFifth Circuit· 1972-06-01· cited 97×
- United States v. PalermoSeventh Circuit· 1969-04-03· cited 93×
- United States v. Juan Navarro, Andres Mugercia and Guillermo PerdomoSeventh Circuit· 1984-06-14· cited 91×
- United States v. Sheldon R. Teller and John D. SullivanSeventh Circuit· 1969-07-07· cited 65×
- United States v. Anthony L. Cavallaro and Gerald J. BrownSecond Circuit· 1977-04-19· cited 46×
- State v. HassbergerSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-26· cited 36×
- James McGrath v. Douglas VinzantFirst Circuit· 1976-06-01· cited 21×
- Golz v. Children's Bureau of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 17×
- Blanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-12-13· cited 13×
- Loren v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-15· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.